Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 771 P.2d 696 - Johnson v. Johnson

Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

181
cited by 181 later decisions
23
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 177 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 181 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably 179 Ill. 2d 367 - Best v. Taylor MacHine Works (1997), Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson (2007)

1 federal appellate · 177 state decisions — followed in 23 states

70019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Walker · Jones v. Jones · Hertz v. Hertz · Western Kane County Special Service District No. 1 v. Jackson Cattle Co. · Olson v. Olson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 181 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The parties married in 1966, following Dr. Johnson’s first year in medical school. Mrs. Johnson had a Bachelor’s Degree in business. While he was in medical school, she worked, thereby supplying $14,000 to the marriage. He earned about $3,500 during that time. His parents paid for tuition and books. During his one-year internship, both worked. After 1970, she did not work outside the home. The parties have three children. After twenty years of marriage they separated, having enjoyed an affluent standard of living. They stipulated to an equal division of real and personal property, yielding $428,000 for her and $428,000 for him. Each party received over $200,000 of income-producing personal property.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) Mrs. Johnson’s needs; (2) her ability to provide for herself, including an earning capacity baseline; (3) elimination of the ten-year cap on alimony; (4) a separate finding concerning income which will flow to both parties from the respective properties awarded; and (5) an alimony award consistent with those findings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.