Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 771 So. 2d 1275 - Johnson v. Ruby

771 So. 2d 1275 - Johnson v. Ruby’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on G.F.C. v. S.G. · I.A. v. H.H.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] putative father has no right to [seek to] establish paternity of a child who was born into an intact marriage, when the married woman and her husband object.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Any woman who is pregnant or has a child, any man who has reason to believe that he is the father of a child, or any child may bring proceedings in the circuit court, in chancery, to determine the paternity of the child when paternity has not been established by law or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.