Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

771 So. 2d 1290

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 29, 2000

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-11-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2001

1 state decisions

Relies on Hardy v. Douglas

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-11-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1John Smith has appealed from the denial of his Rule 3.800(a) motion for jail credit. The trial court denied Smith’s motion upon accepting the State’s position that Smith did not indicate where in the record the information can be located, or how the record demonstrated his entitlement to relief. See Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

¶2As Smith detailed the dates at issue, directed the trial court to his Broward County “rearrest sheet,” and addressed his inability to obtain such, we find that Smith met his burden. The case is remanded for the trial court to consider the merits of Smith’s claim for additional credit.

DELL, KLEIN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
/771/so2d/1290 · .json · Public domain