Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 771 SO2D 410 - Joseph v. MESC

Joseph v. MESC’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 408 So. 2d 1381 - Wheeler v. Arriola · 621 So. 2d 1211 - COM'N ON ENV. QUALITY v. Chickasaw County Bd. of Supervisors · 639 So. 2d 901 - Sprouse v. MISSISSIPPI EMP. SEC. COM'N · W. T. Raleigh Co. v. Armstrong · 722 So. 2d 547 - Selman v. Selman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he meaning of the term "misconduct," as used in the unemployment compensation statute, was conduct evincing such willful and wanton disregard of the employer's interest as is found in deliberate violations or disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect from his employee. Also, carelessness and negligence of such degree, or recurrence thereof, as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent or evil design, and showing an intentional or substantial disregard of the employer's interest or of the employee's duties and obligations to his employer, came within the term. Mere inefficiency, unsatisfactory conduct, failure in good performance as the result of inability or incapacity, or inadvertences [sic] and ordinary negligence in isolated incidents, and good faith errors in judgment or discretion were not considered "misconduct" within the meaning of the statute.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “tantamount to confession of error and will be accepted as such unless the reviewing court can say with confidence, after considering the record and brief of appealing party, that there was no error.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “no obligation to look to the record to form an opinion against the appellant where the appellee has filed no such brief outlining his opposing position.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.