Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 771 So. 2d 573 - Walker v. State

771 So. 2d 573 - Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 596 So. 2d 957 - Traylor v. State · In re Turner · Dollar v. United States · 699 So. 2d 988 - Escobar v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For a confession or inculpatory statement to be voluntary, the totality of the circumstances surrounding the statement must indicate the statement was the result of a free and rational choice. The mind of the accused should, at the time, be free to act, uninfluenced by fear or hope. To exclude a confession or an inculpatory statement, it is not -necessary that any direct promises or threats be made to the accused. It is sufficient if the circumstances or declarations of those present are calculated to delude the' prisoner as to his true position 'and exert an improper influence over- his mind. A confession or inculpatory statement is not freely and voluntarily given if it has been elicited by direct or implied promises, however slight.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.