Harkness v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
January 2006
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 654 So. 2d 552 - State v. Gray · 675 So. 2d 989 - Fredericks v. State · Akins v. State · 665 So. 2d 303 - Upshaw v. State · 700 So. 2d 392 - McLaughlin v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall have the option of withdrawing from the entire plea agreement since the plea agreement was based on a material mistake of law which works to the benefit of [the defendant].”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jordan v. State“Conviction of a non-existent crime is fundamental error which requires reversal, regardless of whether the error was invited by the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jordan v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.