Wiseman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McClain v. State · 653 So. 2d 1387 - American Fire Protection, Inc. v. Lewis · Barnwell v. State · 604 So. 2d 236 - ESELIN-BULLOCK & ASSO'S INS. AGENCY, INC. v. National General Ins. Co. · Washington v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“There was more than enough evidence presented in this case not only for a jury to decide Wiseman had the required amount of knowledge to meet the elements of uttering a forgery, but also for this Court. As stated above, the testimony of the State’s witnesses, Wise-man’s presenting false identification, Wiseman’s possession of the other cheeks for Igen Troy Stewart, and Wise-man’s admission to the police, all taken together, make it very easy to find that he had knowledge of the forged instrument. It is completely reasonable to reach this conclusion; therefore, the State succeeded in proving all of the elements of the crime of uttering a forgery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cannady v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.