Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 A2D 1156 - In re E.D.R.

In re E.D.R.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2019
most recently cited

1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Santosky v. Kramer · Jonathan Woodner Co. v. Breeden · Psychiatric Institute of Washington v. Allen · Alexander v. National Farmers Organization · In Re Petition for Adoption of J. S. R.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when there is a liberty or fundamental interest at stake, such as in cases involving termination of parental rights”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[I]n most civil cases this court requires only a preponderance of the evidence as the standard of proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.