Delaware Department of Health and Social Services, Division for the Visually Impaired v. United States Department of Education’s Empirical Analysis
772 F.2d 1123 · 1985
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably New Hampshire v. Ramsey (2004), Bennett v. White (1989)
19 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 107 (Randolph-Sheppard Act) · 20 U.S.C. § 107B · 20 U.S.C. § 107B · 20 U.S.C. § 107D · 20 U.S.C. § 107D · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 9 U.S.C. § 9
Relies on Edelman v. Jordan · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States · F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“... to provide any blind licensee dissatisfied with any action arising from the operation or administration of the vending facility program an opportunity for a fair hearing, and to agree to submit the grievances of any blind licensee not otherwise resolved by such hearing to arbitration as provided in section 107d-1 of this title. (Emphasis supplied).”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall be subject to appeal and review as a final agency action for purposes of chapter 7 of such Title 5”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[w]hen Congress [amended the RSA] in 1974 [to] provide[ ] that states desiring to gain access to blind vendor locations in federal facilities must agree to submit to arbitration their disputes with blind vendors, the term arbitration had a well-recognized meaning.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.