Stuart v. Spademan’s Empirical Analysis
772 F.2d 1185 · 1985
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 5 district · 40 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 271 later decisions — most recently November 2024 · most notably Wilson v. Belin (1994), Lak, Inc. v. Deer Creek Enterprises (1989)
45 federal appellate · 5 district · 40 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Burger King Corporation v. Rudzewicz · World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson · Hanson v. Denckla
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 271 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'purposefully directed' his activities at residents of the forum”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When a nonresident defendant presents a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing the district court's jurisdiction over the nonresident.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The court may determine the jurisdictional issue by receiving affidavits, interrogatories, depositions, oral testimony, or any combination of the recognized methods of discovery.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.