Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 F.2d 525 - Marrow v. United States

Marrow v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

772 F.2d 525 · 1985

Citation profile

127
cited by 127 later decisions
4
states following
May 2024
most recently cited

88 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 127 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Shah v. United States (1989), United States v. Sutton (1986)

88 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions

85019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Tollett v. Henderson · Jones v. Barnes · Blackledge v. Allison · MacHibroda v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 127 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nless the motions and files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief.”
    35 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[o]nce a defendant pleads guilty he cannot raise independent claims of deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.