Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 F.2d 597 - Maroufi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Maroufi v. Immigration & Naturalization Service’s Empirical Analysis

772 F.2d 597 · 1985

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2021
most recently cited

40 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2021 · most notably Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu (1988), Gil Ilano v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

40 federal appellate ·

29019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1105A (§ 106 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Stevic · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Jong Ha Wang · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Rios-Pineda · Bolanos-Hernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Ahwazi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service Sahabandu

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unless it finds [the facts asserted] to be 'inherently unbelievable.'”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A prima facie case is established when an alien presents 'affidavits or other evidentiary material,' 8 C.F.R. Sec. 103.5, which, if true, would satisfy the requirements for substantive relief.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “conclusory and speculative inferences drawn from generalized events.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.