Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 F.2d 826 - Johnson v. Wainwright

Johnson v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis

772 F.2d 826 · 1985

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
June 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2010

4 federal appellate ·

301985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Paschal v. Wainwright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The guidelines have clarified the commission’s exercise of its discretion. The commission has created a system by which it attempts to use its discretion in a more uniform manner than previously. The substantive power of the commission remains unchanged; only the manner in which it exercises this power has been altered.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.