Beeman v. BGI Creditors' Liquidating Trust’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Observing that the transactions in a liquidation proceeding may not be as complex as those in a reorganization proceeding, the court nonetheless predicted, persuasively, that allowing Appellants to file late claims and certifying a class of gift card holders would have 'a disastrous effect’ on the remainder of the liquidated estate and the distributions under the Plan.”) (emphasis added). . See Calpine-District, 390 B.R. at 520 (finding that appellant had failed to satisfy the first Chateaugay factor based, in part, on the court’s view that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re Motors Liquidation Co.

2. “). . See Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of LTV Aerospace & Defense Co. v. Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of LTV Steel Co. (In re Chateaugay Corp.), 988 F.2d 322 (2d Cir.1993) (“Chateaugay I”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re Motors Liquidation Co.

3. “affect the re-emergence of the debtor as a revitalized corporate entity” — was inapplicable because Borders liquidated its assets and would not emerge as a new corporate entity”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re Motors Liquidation Co.