United States v. Aleff’s Empirical Analysis
772 F.3d 508 · 2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 286 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 31 U.S.C. § 3729 (False Claims Act) · 31 U.S.C. § 3731 (False Claims Act)
Relies on McCarthy v. United States · BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore · United States v. Halper · United States Marcus v. Hess · Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. Stevens
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“variety of factors, including the reprehensibility of the defendant's conduct; the relationship between the penalty and the harm to the victim; and the sanctions in other cases for comparable misconduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.