Lott v. Colvin’s Empirical Analysis
772 F.3d 546 · 2014
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Sullivan v. Zebley · 134 S. Ct. 1986 - Hall v. Florida · Goff v. Barnhart · Sheila J. Young v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security · Hacker v. Barnhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“significantly subaverage general intellectual functioning with deficits in adaptive functioning”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ash v. Colvin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.