Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 F.3d 994 - Dakura v. Holder

Dakura v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

772 F.3d 994 · 2014

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
February 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1255 (§ 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324A (§ 274a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))

Relies on Djadjou v. Holder · Rodriguez v. Gonzales · Castro v. Attorney General of United States · Kechkar v. Gonzales · Valadez-Munoz v. Holder

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Individual attestation of employment authorization The individual [seeking employment] must attest, under penalty of perjury on the form designated or established for purposes of paragraph (1), that the individual is a citizen or national of the United States, an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, or an alien who is authorized under this chapter or by the Attorney General to be hired, recruited, or referred for such employment. Such attestation may be manifested by either a hand-written or an electronic signature.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the explicit reference to § 1324a in § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii)(I) indicates that private employment is a 'purpose or benefit' of the Act”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.