Morales v. Yeutter’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1160 (§ 210 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · Camp v. Pitts · Porzig v. Nolden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the performance of field work related to planting, cultural practices, cultivating, growing and harvesting of fruits and vegetables of every kind and other perishable commodities, as defined in regulations by the Secretary of Agriculture.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morales v. Yeutter“the period during which field work is to be initiated cannot be predicted with any certainty 60 days in advance of need.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morales v. Yeutter“if the grower is unable to perform the pre-harvest irrigation, he has the opportunity to delay his harvest schedule”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morales v. Yeutter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.