Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 FSUPP 821 - Drummer v. DCI Contracting Corp.

Drummer v. DCI Contracting Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
September 2017
most recently cited

4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2017

4 district ·

130199120002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on Scheuer v. Rhodes · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “NYCRR”) § 465(d)(2)(vi) provides: (1) If the division finds that ... noticing the complaint for hearing would be ... undesirable, the division may, in its unreviewable discretion at any time prior to the taking of testimony at a public hearing ..., dismiss the complaint on grounds of administrative convenience. (2) The grounds for dismissal of a complaint for administrative convenience may include, but not be limited to, the following: (vi) the complainant has initiated or wants to initiate ... court action based on the same grievance. 10 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.