772 F. Supp. 2d 295 - Buckingham v. Mabus’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
9 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 1552 · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Kreis v. Secretary of the Air Force · 903 F. Supp. 96 - Fund for Animals v. Babbitt · Nuclear Energy Institute, Inc. v. Environmental Protection Agency · Frizelle v. Slater · Piersall v. Winter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a case involving review of a final agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act, however, the standard set forth in Rule 56 [ ] does not apply because of the limited role of a court in reviewing the administrative record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Summary judgment thus serves as the mechanism for deciding, as a matter of law, whether the agency action is supported by the administrative record and otherwise consistent with the APA standard of review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'the function of the district court is to determine whether or not as a matter of law the evidence in the administrative record permitted the agency to make the decision it did.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.