Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 P.2d 101 - People v. Wheeler

People v. Wheeler’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
8
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Bogdanov v. People (1997), Palmer v. People (1998)

26 state decisions

1201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Marques · People v. Larson · People v. Paris · People v. Jones · 44 Colo. App. 159 - Matthews v. Industrial Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A person is legally accountable as principal for the behavior of another constituting a criminal offense if, with the intent to promote or facilitate the commission of the offense, he aids, abets, or advises the other person in planning or committing the offense.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “[T]he complicitor must be aware that the principal is engaging in [negligent] conduct.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “To support responsibility under the complicity statute it is only necessary to prove that (1) the principal committed the crime, (2) knowledge by the complicitor that the principal intended to commit the crime, and (3) the complicitor having the requisite knowledge, did aid, abet or encourage the principal in the commission of the crime, (emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.