Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 P.2d 98 - People v. Patrick

People v. Patrick’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · People v. Dement · People v. Oliver · People v. Thornburg · People v. McNulty

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “€œTo support such a claim, it is imperative that the trial court make some factual record that indicates what causes the statute to be unconstitutional as applied.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[I)t is imperative that there be some factual record made by the trial court which states why ... the statute is unconstitutional as applied.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[Wle cannot determine the as-applied constitutionality of a statute based upon an incomplete record of the facts.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.