Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

772 So. 2d 1

Rigsby v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-06-28

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently December 2006

3 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-06-28

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Vincent Rigsby appeals, under a single notice of appeal, the trial court’s summary denial, in separate orders, of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We have carefully considered both motions and find no reversible error in either of the trial court’s orders denying relief. We accordingly affirm as to both.

¶2Affirmed.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and PARKER and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.
/772/so2d/1 · .json · Public domain