¶1Specially concurring.
¶2I concur because I am bound by this court’s decision in T.M. In'the absence of this precedent, however, I would agree with Judge Northcutt’s analysis of the issues. See T.M. (Northcutt, J., dissenting).
772 So. 2d 17
D.N.S. v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 9, 2000
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-08-09
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2001
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2000-08-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →