Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

772 So. 2d 614

Docket No. 1D99-4099.

Hudson v. State

Randall HUDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 12, 2000.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-12-12

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 2005

2 state decisions

Relies on Rudder v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-12-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1James C. Banks, Special Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Karla D. Ellis, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We affirm appellant's judgment and sentences, except for that portion of the written sentence that does not conform with the trial court's oral pronouncement. The court orally pronounced a sentence of five years on the grand theft count and imposed a sentence of eleven years, nine months in the written sentence.

¶5We remand this case with instructions for the written sentence to be conformed to the court's oral pronouncement. See Frost v. State,769 So.2d 443 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)("Where there is a discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written sentence, we should remand for the trial court to conform the written sentence to the oral pronouncement."). As noted in Frost, appellant need not be present for the correction of the sentence upon remand. The judgment of conviction and sentences are otherwise affirmed.

¶6BOOTH, LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

/772/so2d/614 · .json · Public domain