Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 So. 2d 956 - Twichell v. Twichell

772 So. 2d 956 - Twichell v. Twichell’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Vest v. Vest · 642 So. 2d 885 - Megison v. Megison · Bland v. Bland · Middleton v. Middleton · 631 So. 2d 114 - Richardson v. Richardson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The relative financial positions of the parties ... can be relevant factors”; Twichell v. Twichell, 00-1248, p. 4 (La.App. 5 Cir. 11/28/00), 772 So.2d 956 , 959 “The party requesting the reduction bears the burden of proof to demonstrate a change in the financial condition of either himself or his wife”; Dauphine v. Dau-phine, 511 So.2d 53, 56 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1987)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “payments will continue until she remarries or until defendant retires, whichever event occurs sooner, or as otherwise provided by law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.