Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 SW2D 288 - Reese v. State

Reese v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently March 2019

6 state decisions

401989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Knight v. International Harvester Credit Corp. · Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Cross · Bearden v. State · Munroe v. State · Baldonado v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The court shall set aside its previous order denying Rasbury’s motion for new trial. 2. The court shall conduct another hearing on Rasbury’s motion for new trial within sixty days after the date of this order, and shall admit only evidence and affidavits from jurors relevant to whether the jury received other evidence concerning Rasbury’s claim of self-defense during its deliberations on guilt-innocence. 3. The court shall then enter another order ruling on Rasbury’s motion for new trial, supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law. 4. The court shall forward a statement of facts of the hearing and a supplemental transcript, containing any jurors’ affidavits not heretofore filed, the order on Rasbury’s motion for new trial and accompanying findings of fact and conclusions of law to the clerk of this court within thirty days after concluding the hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.