Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 SW2D 428 - Franks v. State

Franks v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Norton v. Shelby County · Norton v. Shelby Co State of Tennessee · DAVIDSON COUNTY v. Elrod · 7 Smith & H. 109 - Roberts v. Roane County · Catlett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the “void ab initio” approach, an unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed. Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 , 6 S.Ct. 1121 , 30 L.Ed. 178 (1886). However, in Roberts v. Roane County, 160 Tenn. 109 , 23 S.W.2d 239 (1929) this Court recognized “that parties may so deal with each other upon the faith of such a statute that neither may invoke the aid of the courts to undo what they themselves have done.” Id. at 124 , 23 S.W.2d at 243 . Because of the presumption in favor of the constitutionality of statutes, the public and individuals are bound to observe a statute though unconstitutional, until it is declared void by an authoritative tribunal. O’Brien v. Rutherford County, 199 Tenn. 642 , 288 S.W.2d 708 (1956)....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The Judges of the Supreme or Inferior Courts, shall, at stated times, receive a compensation for their services, to be ascertained by law, which shall not be increased or diminished during the time for which they are elected.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Such clause evinces an intent on the part of our legislature to have the valid parts of the statute remain in force, unless observance thereof would frustrate the object of its passage.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.