Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 772 SW2D 449 - Stull v. State

Stull v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Fields v. City of South Houston (1991), Johnson v. State (1994)

2 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

3001989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Beck v. State of Ohio · Henry v. United States · Russell v. State · Hoag v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether at that moment the facts and circumstances within the officer's knowledge and of which he had reasonably trustworthy information were sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the arrested person had committed or was committing an offense.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(b) A peace officer may arrest an offender without a warrant for any offense committed in his presence or within his view.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[P]robable cause requires only a probability or substantial chance of criminal activity, not an actual showing of such activity. By hypothesis, therefore, innocent behavior frequently will provide the basis for a showing of probable cause; to require otherwise would be to sub silentio impose a drastically more rigorous definition of probable cause than the security of our citizens demands.... In making a determination of probable cause the relevant inquiry is not whether particular conduct is "innocent" or "guilty," but the degree of suspicion that attaches to particular types of noncriminal acts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.