Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 773 F.2d 1032 - Piatt v. MacDougall

Piatt v. MacDougall’s Empirical Analysis

773 F.2d 1032 · 1985

Citation profile

104
cited by 104 later decisions
3
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

70 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Soranno's Gasco, Inc. v. Morgan (1989), Smith v. City of Fontana (1987)

70 federal appellate · 8 district · 4 state decisions

4801985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Parratt v. Taylor · Goldberg v. Kelly · Allen v. McCurry · Hudson v. Palmer · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “deliberate, considered, planned or prescribed conduct by state officials”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Because Arizona has established, by statute, a right of inmates to compensation for work performed for private parties, it cannot deny [the inmate] that right after he has earned the wages, without affording him due process of the law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in which the state administrative machinery did not and could not have learned of the deprivation until after it had occurred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.