Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 773 F.2d 1048 - Kuster v. Block

Kuster v. Block’s Empirical Analysis

773 F.2d 1048 · 1985

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently January 2013

11 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

1001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord · Flanagan v. United States · Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. Koller · Baumann v. Arizona Department of Corrections

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) conclusively determine the disputed issue, (2) resolve an important issue completely separate from the merits of the action, and (3) be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “cannot be assessed fairly until the substance of both [the plaintiffs'] case and that of the defendant become known.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the [plaintiff] to articulate his claim pro se....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.