In Re Robert L Lundak’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 district · 1 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “... does not require the transfer of a sample of the invention to an independent depository prior to the filing date of the patent application. The requirements of PTO access to a sample of Lundak’s cell line during pendency, and public access after grant, were met by Lundak’s procedures. Lundak’s deposit ..., which was made after filing but prior to issuance of his patent, and which is referred to in his specification, meets the statutory requirements.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. 11 F. Supp. 2d 338 - Evans Medical Ltd. v. American Cyanamid Co.

2. “No problem exists when the microorganisms used are known and readily available to the public.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. In Re Jack R Wands Vincent R Zurawski Jr and Hubert Jp Schoemaker