City of Cleveland v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Empirical Analysis
773 F.2d 1368 · 1985
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently August 2023
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 824D (§ 205 of the Federal Power Act of 1920) · 16 U.S.C. § 825L (§ 313 of the Federal Power Act of 1920) · 28 U.S.C. § 291 · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. · Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Federal Maritime Commission · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations Inc v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System Association of Data Processing Service Organizations Inc · Trans-Pacific Freight Conference of Japan/Korea v. Federal Maritime Commission · Ass'n of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“must reasonably be read to require the recitation of only those practices that affect rates and services significantly, that are realistically susceptible of specification, and that are not so generally understood in any contractual arrangement as to render recitation superfluous.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the ... practices ... affecting such rates and charges.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“of some absolute prescribed standard literally set forth in the statute and regulations,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.