Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 773 F.2d 736 - Hawley

Hawley’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently February 2011 · most notably Suhre v. Haywood County (1997), Washegesic v. Bloomingdale Public Schools (1994)

3 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

1601980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Baker v. Carr · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Flast v. Cohen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even if [the plaintiffs] can avoid the chapel area by utilizing different concourses or stairways, this impingement on their right to use the airport is sufficient to confer standing since it would 'force them to assume special burdens' to avoid 'unwelcome[d] religious exercises.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “a distinction between the requirements of taxpayer standing in suits by federal taxpayers and suits by municipal taxpayers.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “whether the rental of the space for the chapel to the diocese at the agreed-upon price could harm Cleveland's fisc,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.