Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 773 P.2d 1081 - People v. Afentul

People v. Afentul’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2019

4 state decisions

201989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. People · People v. Widhalm · Johansen v. Schuettig · La Fitte v. City of Ft. Collins · People v. Anadale

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the burden ... shifts to the defendant to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that he was financially unable to make the payments at the time they should have been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the court orders the defendant to make restitution, evidence of failure to pay the said restitution shall constitute prima facie evidence of a violation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.