Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 773 P.2d 1368 - State v. Williams

State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently April 2023

14 state decisions

5019891990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Olden v. Kentucky · Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp. · State v. Lafferty · United States v. Kasto

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Such evidence is admissible only when the court finds under the ctireumstances of the particular case such evidence is relevant to a material factual dispute and its probative value outweighs the inherent danger of unfair prejudice to the [victim], confusion of issues, unwarranted invasion of the complainant's privacy, considerations of undue delay and time waste and the needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “wide latitude insofar as the Confrontation Clause is concerned to impose reasonable limits on such cross-examination based on concerns about, among other things, harassment, prejudice, confusion of the issues, the witness'[s] safety, or interrogation that is repetitive or only marginally relevant,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “requires only that the accused be permitted to introduce all relevant and admissible evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.