773 So. 2d 338 - Logan v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
30 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · 705 So. 2d 307 - Holland v. State · 707 So. 2d 547 - De La Beckwith v. State · Smith v. United States · 551 So. 2d 162 - Dunaway v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`The test to determine if an improper comment by a prosecutor requires reversal is whether the natural and probable effect of the prosecuting attorney's argument created unjust prejudice against the accused resulting in a decision influenced by prejudice.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“A trial judge's determination as to whether a witness is qualified to testify as an expert is given the widest possible discretion and that decision will only be disturbed when there has been a clear abuse of discretion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he Mississippi Supreme Court has held `in order to take advantage of improper argument on the part of a prosecuting attorney, objection must be interposed at the time the statement is made, and the point will not be considered on appeal unless motion for a mistrial is timely made.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.