Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 773 SO2D 34 - Sireci v. State

Sireci v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

22 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Kyles v. Whitley · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Caldwell v. Mississippi

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A defendant may not simply file a motion for postconviction relief containing conclusory allegations that his or her trial counsel was ineffective and then expect to receive an evidentiary hearing.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “whether `the favorable evidence could reasonably be taken to put the whole case in such a different light as to undermine confidence in the verdict.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[1] The evidence at issue must be favorable to the accused, either because it is exculpatory, or because it is impeaching; [2] that evidence must have been suppressed by the State, either willfully or inadvertently; and [3] prejudice must have ensued.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.