Sireci v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
April 2018
most recently cited
22 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Kyles v. Whitley · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc · Caldwell v. Mississippi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant may not simply file a motion for postconviction relief containing conclusory allegations that his or her trial counsel was ineffective and then expect to receive an evidentiary hearing.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether `the favorable evidence could reasonably be taken to put the whole case in such a different light as to undermine confidence in the verdict.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[1] The evidence at issue must be favorable to the accused, either because it is exculpatory, or because it is impeaching; [2] that evidence must have been suppressed by the State, either willfully or inadvertently; and [3] prejudice must have ensued.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Floyd v. State · Rose v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.