773 So. 2d 374 - Walker v. Reed’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 617 So. 2d 248 - Sperry-New Holland v. Prestage · Herrington v. Spell · 546 So. 2d 678 - Wilner v. Mississippi Export R. Co. · 740 So. 2d 836 - Pickering v. Industria Masina I Traktora · 749 So. 2d 1254 - American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Hogue
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The standard requires the trial court to consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, giving that party the benefit of all reasonable inferences that may be derived from the evidence, as well as contemplating any uncontradicted evidence presented by the moving party. The Mississippi Supreme Court has also held that an issue should only be presented to the jury when the evidence creates a question of fact on which reasonable jurors could disagree.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.