Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 773 So. 2d 99 - Hall v. State

773 So. 2d 99 - Hall v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Graham v. Connor · Albright v. Oliver · Harmelin v. Michigan · 714 So. 2d 429 - State v. Mancino · Washington v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ecause there is no constitutional right to sentencing guidelines—or, more generally, to a less discretionary application of sentences than that permitted prior to the Guidelines—the limitations the Guidelines place on a judge's discretion cannot violate a defendant's right to due process by reason of being vague”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.