Strong v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2016
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Upjohn Company v. United States · Fisher v. United States · In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · Michel v. United States · Abel v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]n light of the record showing the appointment of two attorneys to represent each defendant on February 14, 1986, coupled with evidence that Baldwin never communicated with [Strong] at any stage of his prosecution, it is clear that Baldwin was never [Strong’s] attorney. Accordingly, the trial court was correct in finding that he was, not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mixon v. State“(5) A communication is “confidential” if not intended to be disclosed to third persons other than those to whom disclosure is made in furtherance of the rendiiion of professional legal services to the client or those reasonably necessary for the transmission of the communication.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Zenon v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.