Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 774 F.2d 1029 - Karr v. Smith

Karr v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

774 F.2d 1029 · 1985

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
1
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

27 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably United States v. Morgan (1991), Fogarty v. Gallegos (2008)

27 federal appellate · 17 district · 1 state decisions

2801985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · White v. Morgan · E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Maloney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the 'fellow officer' rule, 'probable cause is to be determined by the courts on the basis of the collective information of the police involved in the arrest, rather than exclusively on the extent of the knowledge of the particular officer who may actually make the arrest.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Probable cause exists where the facts and circumstances within an officer's knowledge and of which he had reasonably trustworthy information are sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that an offense has been or is being committed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]his rule of probable cause has been described as a “practical, nontechnical conception affording the best compromise that has been found for accommodating these often opposing interests. Requiring more would unduly hamper law enforcement. To allow less would be to leave law-abiding citizens at the mercy of the officers’ whim or caprice.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.