Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 774 F.2d 1332 - Van Ooteghem v. Gray

Van Ooteghem v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis

774 F.2d 1332 · 1985

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
May 2013
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2013 · most notably Parker v. Williams (1989), McMillian v. Johnson (1996)

21 federal appellate ·

1701985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Perry v. Sindermann · Kentucky v. Graham · Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · Central Intelligence Agency v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “decisions regarding termination of [an employee] fall on the local not the state side of his duty: he was about the business of county government ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “effectuation of the policy of the State of Texas [and] ... discretionary local duties in the administration of county government,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “action must necessarily be considered to represent official policy”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.