Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 774 F.2d 1371 - Dollar Rent Car of Washington Inc v. Travelers Indemnity Company Viking Reinsurance Company Ltd

Dollar Rent Car of Washington Inc v. Travelers Indemnity Company Viking Reinsurance Company Ltd’s Empirical Analysis

774 F.2d 1371 · 1985

Citation profile

89
cited by 89 later decisions
August 2016
most recently cited

55 federal appellate · 5 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 89 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably United States v. Yarbrough (1988), Direx Israel, Ltd. v. Breakthrough Medical Corp. (1991)

55 federal appellate · 5 district ·

4801985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Mahan v. Howell · Union Processing Corp. v. Atkin Et Al. · Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 89 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The moving party may meet its burden by demonstrating either (1) a combination of probable success on the merits and the possibility of irreparable injury or (2) that serious questions are raised and the balance of hardships tips sharply in its favor.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “An essential prerequisite to the granting of a preliminary injunction is a showing of irreparable injury to the moving party in its absence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.