Kuntzelman v. Black’s Empirical Analysis
774 F.2d 291 · 1985
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2013
13 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Briggs Transportation Co. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters · West v. Louisiana · Thompson v. Wainwright · Manning-El v. Wyrick · Purnell v. Missouri Department of Corrections
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“were at least arguably relevant and probative in showing the identity and condition of the deceased, the location of the wound, and the intent of [the petitioner] in firing the shot that killed [the victim]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“`only when the alleged error infringes upon a specific constitutional protection or is so prejudicial that it amounts to a denial of due process.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he jury's finding ... clearly rests on a substantial factual basis, even absent the photographic evidence in controversy here,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rousan v. Roper
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.