Guerrero v. Katzen’s Empirical Analysis
774 F.2d 506 · 1985
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Wallace v. Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (1998), Saud v. Bank of New York (1991)
6 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Romano v. United States · Dixson v. United States · Credithrift of America, Inc. v. United States · Bates v. Devers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A federal court must give to a state court judgment the same preclusive effect as would be given that judgment under the law of the state in which the judgment was rendered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the evidence was either fraudulently concealed or it could not have been discovered with due diligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.