Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 774 F.2d 516 - United States v. Bayko

United States v. Bayko’s Empirical Analysis

774 F.2d 516 · 1985

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

54 federal appellate · 22 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2024 · most notably Morison v. United States (1988), United States v. Hurtado (1985)

54 federal appellate · 22 district · 2 state decisions

34019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3143 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3145 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3147 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3148 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3731

Relies on United States v. American College of Physicians · Johnston v. Holiday Inns, Inc. · United States v. Jessup · United States v. Delker · United States v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A) by clear and convincing evidence that the person is not likely to flee or pose a danger to the safety of any person or the community if released under section 3142(b) or (c) of this title; and B) that the appeal is not for the purpose of delay and raises a substantial question of law or fact likely to result in reversal, an order for a new trial, a sentence that does not include a term of imprisonment, or a reduced sentence to a term of imprisonment less than the total of the time already served plus the expected duration of the appeal process.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “shall be determined promptly upon such papers, affidavits, and portions of the record as the parties shall present.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “tempered by deference to the district court's firsthand judgment.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.