Cisneros-Guerrerro v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
774 F.3d 1056 · 2014
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez · SILVA-TREVINO · 7 Cal. 3d 362 - In Re Smith · Rodriguez-Castro v. Gonzales · Amouzadeh v. Winfrey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“has not been convicted of an offense under section 1182(a)(2), 1227(a)(2),- or 1227(a)(3) of this title”). 9 . Id. (quoting Rodriguez-Castro v. Gonzales, 427 F.3d 316 , 319-20 (5th Cir. 2005)). 10 . Id. (quoting In re Sejas, 24 I. & N. Dec. 236 , 237 (BIA 2007)); see also Garcia-Maldonado, 491 F.3d at 288 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Laryea v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.