Smith v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
774 F.3d 1166 · 2014
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
July 2016
most recently cited
Appellate journey
Relationships
Relies on Torgerson v. City of Rochester · Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip · Solem v. Bartlett · South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe · Hagen Utah
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether Congress intended to 'diminish' the boundaries of the Omaha Indian Reservation in Nebraska when it enacted an 1882 Act that ratified an agreement for the sale of Omaha tribal lands to non-Indian settlers.” Smith v. Parker, 774 F.3d 1166, 1167 (8th Cir.2014).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Appellants challenge the district court's determination that the Omaha Indian Reservation was not diminished by an 1882 act of Congress”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nebraska v. Parker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.