Stuart v. Camnitz’s Empirical Analysis
774 F.3d 238 · 2014
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Roe v. Wade · Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc. · West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette · Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. P Casey P Casey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[ Casey ] did not hold sweepingly that all regulation of speech in the medical context merely receives rational basis review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“• the nature and purpose of the abortion procedure to be performed as well as the medical risks and alternatives to the procedure that a reasonable patient would consider material to the decision of whether or not to undergo the abortion; • the probable gestational age of the fetus; • the medical risks associated with carrying the pregnancy to term; • the availability of printed materials published by the Cabinet for Health and Family Services that she has a right to view free of charge if she so chooses; • the potential availability of medical assistance benefits for prenatal care, childbirth, and neonatal care; and • the liability of the father of the fetus to assist in the support of her child.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“All that is left of petitioners' argument is an asserted First Amendment right of a physician not to provide information about the risks of abortion, and childbirth, in a manner mandated by the State. To be sure, the physician's First Amendment rights not to speak are implicated, but only as part of the practice of medicine, subject to reasonable licensing and regulation by the State. We see no constitutional infirmity in the requirement that the physician provide the information mandated by the State here.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.